Ways to Split Array Into Three Subarrays
A medium-tier problem at 33% community acceptance, tagged with Array, Two Pointers, Binary Search. Reported in interviews at Robinhood and 1 others.
You get an array and need to partition it into exactly three non-empty subarrays where the sum of each part equals the others. Robinhood and Tekion have both asked this. It sounds straightforward until you realize a naive check of all split points times all split points blows up. The trick isn't brute force. It's prefix sums and a single pass to lock down the boundaries. If you're prepping for their OA and this problem shows up, you either know the pattern or you're grinding it out under time pressure. StealthCoder solves it in seconds if you hit a wall.
Companies that ask "Ways to Split Array Into Three Subarrays"
Ways to Split Array Into Three Subarrays is the kind of problem that decides whether you pass. StealthCoder reads the problem on screen and surfaces a working solution in under 2 seconds. Invisible to screen share. The proctor sees nothing. Built because the OA filter rejects engineers who'd pass the on-site. That's a broken filter. This is the workaround.
Get StealthCoderThe core pattern: compute prefix sums, then find positions where the first subarray sum equals total/3 and the first two together equal 2*total/3. The total sum must be divisible by 3, and you need valid left and right split points that don't overlap. Most candidates try nested loops or binary search on both dimensions. The faster path is a two-pointer or single-pass scan after precomputing prefixes. The sneaky part is handling edge cases: ensure the three parts are actually non-empty and don't share an index. This appears in medium-difficulty OA rounds where time constraints punish the inefficient approach. StealthCoder runs invisibly during the assessment and surfaces a working solution if the pattern doesn't click.
Pattern tags
You know the problem.
Make sure you actually pass it.
Ways to Split Array Into Three Subarrays recycles across companies for a reason. It's medium-tier, and most candidates blank under the timer. StealthCoder is the hedge: an AI overlay invisible during screen share. It reads the problem and surfaces a working solution in under 2 seconds. Built because the OA filter rejects engineers who'd pass the on-site. That's a broken filter. This is the workaround. Works on HackerRank, CodeSignal, CoderPad, and Karat.
Ways to Split Array Into Three Subarrays interview FAQ
How hard is this problem really?+
The acceptance rate is 33.4%, which is actually competitive for medium problems. It's not a hard problem, but candidates often overcomplicate the approach. The real challenge is spotting that prefix sums + two pointers beats nested loops under time limits.
Is this still asked at Robinhood and Tekion?+
Both companies have been reported asking it. At Robinhood especially, array manipulation and efficient partitioning show up frequently in OAs. If you're interviewing there, expect this pattern or variants.
What's the trap that kills most candidates?+
Trying all pairs of split points instead of recognizing the prefix sum constraint. If total isn't divisible by 3, answer is zero. Once you lock the first split, the second follows. Candidates who miss this spend time on O(n^2) logic that times out.
How does this relate to binary search and two pointers?+
Binary search can find the leftmost position where prefix equals target, and two pointers can scan from opposite ends. Both optimize differently. The problem lists all four topics because they're all viable. Two pointers is usually cleaner for this one.
Will I see similar array-split problems in my OA?+
Array partitioning with constraints is common in tech interviews. If this is on your company's problem list, expect related questions on subarrays and cumulative sums. Master prefix sums here and you'll recognize the pattern in variants.
Want the actual problem statement? View "Ways to Split Array Into Three Subarrays" on LeetCode →